|

|
MYSTERY OF THE
TEXAS TWOSTEP
CHAPTER ONE HUNDRED
FOURTEEN:
SWITCHING PARTNERS
Written by Rick
Archer
|
Rick
Archer's Note:
When I say that
Slow Dance leads to Romance, I am
completely serious. As V-Ann liked to say, any
man who learns to dance has a chance. As we
shall see, SSQQ turned into the most remarkable
Wedding Factory that was ever created.
However, as of 1982, the studio was still missing
the last key element: The Circle. This chapter
explains how my decision to INSIST that my students
switch partners while dancing in the Circle led to
phenomenal developments, the most important of which I never
anticipated: Romance.
For 'The
Circle' to work, first I needed to overcome a
serious obstacle: Married couples and committed
unmarried couples.
To
introduce this subject, I going to let my friend
Miss Manners tell it like it is. I found this
article in my archives along with a date: "September
5, 2002" under the topic "Switching Partners".
Given that this date was over 20 years old, my
memory regarding its origin was non-existent.
Since much of the language was foreign to me, I have
no doubt Miss Manners wrote this
article. However, since I agreed with
everything Miss Manners said, I suspect I may have inserted some of my own
thoughts. For that reason, it is best to
assume Miss Manners wrote 90% and I chimed in with a
couple of my own comments.
Why is
this article important? Because it perfectly describes the
reluctance many married couples feel regarding
switching partners.
|
 |
Dear Miss
Manners:
My husband and I recently signed up to take some
dance lessons together. When the class
started, we were very surprised that the teacher
expected us to take turns dancing with everyone
in the room.
Her
reason was that in social dancing situations, it
is expected that you trade partners frequently.
Obviously, if we
had known this, we would not have signed up,
but, fortunately, we were able to gracefully
excuse ourselves at an appropriate moment and cancel the remaining lessons. After
checking with several more studios, I found this
switching practice to be the norm.
I realize that traditionally it was expected for
ladies to dance with whoever asked them, but I
thought that went out along with hoop skirts (or
at least poodle skirts!) I
certainly never thought that
concept applied to
married couples. Perhaps
we don't move in the highest of social circles,
but anywhere I have ever seen social dancing
(weddings, formal office parties, charity balls,
etc.), I have never seen this practice
of switching, outside
of the occasional teenager who happens to have
attended. In this day and age, I would never let
a stranger touch and hold me while dancing, and
even if it was a close friend, I wouldn't
allow it for
the sake of appearances.
Am I
correct in feeling that this tradition no longer
takes place, or are my friends and I simply
gauche? We are taking private lessons from now
on.
Gentle
Reader:
Gauche? Only if you embarrass respectable
gentlemen by treating conventional social
invitations to dance as if they were erotic
overtures.
'Prudish' is the word that Miss Manners would
use. She does not normally consider
being asked to dance the
insult that you describe.
I pride myself on a bit of prudishness of
my own, but you have far outdone
me. Dancing at parties and
celebrations (as opposed to public nightclubs)
is a perfectly standard form of socializing that
Miss Manners is astonished to hear
you and your friends
consider tantamount to marital infidelity.
At
those weddings you attend,
surely you see the
bride dancing with people
other than her husband.
Her father, her
father-in-law, her husband's best man, the
groomsmen. And perhaps
her male friends from work or college.
Do you all stand around
and twitter about that brazen hussy allowing
others to hold her?
Of course not. In the world I inhabit, Dancing with other partners
is perfectly acceptable even when married.
|
|
SUMMER OF
1982
SWITCHING PARTNERS
|
Due to
the Growing Pains I have alluded to, 1982 was
nowhere near as much fun as 1981. In
particular, the issue of Switching Partners was a
source of endless headaches. In the long run,
my decision to use the Circle and the frequent
rotation of partners would lead to remarkable
developments. However in the short term I had
a difficult uphill climb ahead of me.
I
introduced the use of the Circle in my group classes
in the summer of 1982. It did not take long to
see the incredible potential of the Circle as a teaching tool.
There were three immediate benefits. First, the
introduction of a female assistant helped the men
improve their leads. Second, by dancing with many
different
partners, women learned to follow better. Most
important, in time the Circle would lead to a dramatic uptick in
the group spirit of every class.
Using my previous system, the
single men picked the single women and the couples picked
each other. The two groups rarely intersected.
The Circle changed that. Switching partners gave
everyone an effortless way to interact.
Let's say a class had 40 people.
The Circle allowed 20 men to meet all 20 women and vice
versa. Each time a man switched to the next woman,
the two of them exchanged a polite smile. The next time they met
perhaps they
would chat. Over time, the 20 men got to know the 20
women in a relaxed way, allowing friendships to develop
gradually. Sometimes people would click
romantically. More often, warm friendships would develop.
Thanks to the Circle, the lines between singles and couples
began to blur. My group classes had long been
incubators for love and friendship, but the Circle worked
three times as well. The use of name tags and frequent
rotations marked the start of many new friendships, some of
which led to close ties. When these students went
dancing at a club together, they already knew each other so much
better than in the old days. Previously the couples
would stick to each other all night long. Not
any more. With the 'stranger' barrier
removed, the Circle experience helped couples became
much more comfortable dancing with their new
friends.
As for
the singles, Dance classes were not
just about the birds and the bees anymore. Now the
classes were just as much about forming friendships.
But the best part for the singles was the built-in
excuse to get to know each other over a prolonged
length of time. No longer forced to overcome
the natural mistrust of dealing with strangers in
nightclubs and the fear of rejection, my students
could take their sweet time getting to know each
other. This would lead to a very powerful development...
marriages!
All
because a body builder nearly killed me in dance class.
Very curious how that worked out.
One of
the innovations Scott inspired was the use of
female assistants in my Circle technique.
Scott had shown me that no matter how well I
demonstrated and explained a pattern, there is a 'feel'
to these moves that transcends the traditional way
patterns are taught. The only way to see if the man
truly understood a pattern was to dance with him. That
is why a woman with prior dance
experience was needed to double-check the leads
and footwork of each male student.
The
addition of Assistants made an instant impact in the
quality of my group classes. Here is how it worked. I still used
'boys on one
side, girls on the other'. The separation made it easy to observe while I demonstrated with my assistant.
Then I would
say find a partner and form the Circle. The men would
start with their favorite partner and do the pattern. On my
command the men would move forward and switch to the next
lady in
the Circle. Before class was over, the man would have
danced with every woman in the class several times. I knew I was on the
right track when one woman quipped that her
husband was 'much improved' when he finally rotated
back to her. By forcing her husband to learn
to lead women he did not know, he began to pay
better attention to the fine points. The same
lady added something very curious. She was
glad he learned his lessons with women
who were more forgiving about his mistakes than she
was. This is how I began to suspect an odd
phenomenon: some women are much more patient
with strangers than they are with their own spouse.
|
This message was
reinforced in a humorous way one night during dance class. A man named Juan spoke up
in class. "Hey, Rick, now I know why you switch
partners."
"Why is that?"
I replied.
"Last week
three different men stepped on my wife's foot.
Each time the men apologized, I overheard Sally say, 'Oh,
it's okay, it didn't hurt much, don't worry about it'.
Then I stepped on Sally's foot. Big mistake. Oh my God,
Sally complained all the way back to the Woodlands!
'Oh, my foot hurts so bad! The pain won't stop.
My foot is throbbing. I don't know if I'll be able to walk tomorrow.'"
What a thing to say! Everyone laughed
including me. Sally was giving
Juan the evil eye, but he didn't seem to mind. Realizing Juan
was onto something, I asked, "Can I assume
you have a message to share?"
"Switching partners
in dance class is the only way married people can take
dance lessons. It limits the damage a wife can
make to a husband's pride."
When Sally
sheepishly admitted the story was true, the students could
not stop grinning. I saw things at a deeper
level. When a man only dances with one woman, she
memorizes what he will do next. This allows the man to
get away with lousy, haphazard leads. By switching
partners, each man is forced to learn to lead better.
Why? Because he is dancing with women who are unable to read
his mind.
|

|
Dancing in a Circle dramatically improved the
quality of the group dance experience at SSQQ. Why?
Because it made it easy for me to dance with every
woman and make suggestions. Even more
important, my lady assistant was able to monitor the
quality of the men's leads. Either she would
make a direct suggestion to the man or she would report
areas of confusion to me. The use of assistants allowed me to
identify leads that needed further explanation.
As I fine-tuned
my system, I proved that group dance lessons can be
almost as effective as private lessons. And
far less expensive as well. Thanks to the
invention of the Circle, we
were no longer the McDonalds of dance studios. In fact,
let me take this line of thought one step further.
The old adage is that Practice makes Perfect.
I will concede that private lessons with a good
instructor can teach lead and follow technique more
effectively (and faster) than group lessons.
However, private lessons have their drawbacks.
For example, a single woman learns to follow a man
who possesses exceptional leads. What happens
when she dances with normal men whose leads are
inferior? She gets frustrated. In group
class a woman learns to follow the entire spectrum
of leads from abysmal to superior.
When the private lesson is
over, who is the single woman going to dance with?
The absence of a committed partner makes many women
wary of going to a club on her own. Not so
with group lessons at my studio. Now the same
woman has an army of men asking her to dance.
Same for a man. Who is he going to practice
with? And even if his leads are good, there is
no guarantee the women he asks to dance are anywhere
near his level. What happens when a woman with
limited training fails to recognize his more
complicated patterns?
|
I can
debate the trade-offs between private and group lessons all
night long, but there was one huge advantage my Group classes
had over Private lessons... Friendship.
I
marveled at how people who were already excellent dancers
continued to take more lessons for months and months, even
years, after they achieved their original goal. They
continued to take lessons specifically as a way to see their
friends.
And
what happened next? One of two things. All that
practice made them just as good at dancing as anyone who took
private lessons and usually BETTER. Or they met the love
of their life and moved on to the next stage.
All I
can say is thank goodness Scott opened my eyes. What a
great idea! I called it my 'Isaac Newton moment'.
Once the
invention of the Circle gave me a face-saving way to rotate
partners, it led to a profound development of group spirit.
Good will had always been present, but the Circle created a
heightened sense of 'Community'.
I
considered this discovery to be a remarkable stroke of
good fortune. Would I
have thought of the Circle idea on my own? Maybe, maybe
not. As I keep saying, I may
not be smart, but I am definitely lucky.
|
 |
Unfortunately, these improvements did not take place overnight. Of course there was protest. Change
always brings problems. The singles were all for it, but
the couples were skeptical. In particular, a surprising number
of husbands and wives as well as committed but unmarried partners
insisted on staying together. They asked why
switching was necessary. I explained my reasons, but a good
20% of my current students chose to disagree. Many of
these protesters were students I had known for some time, people
I considered friends. In fact, some of them told me how
hurt they felt that they were suddenly no longer permitted to
dance exclusively with each other. The
naysayers were in the minority, but they had a strong voice.
Naturally I felt compelled to appease them. So for
the first month I broke the class into two groups: The
Circle on one side of the room and a smaller group of married couples who danced
strictly with each other. Very soon a funny thing
happened. During Break two wives came over to complain the
men in the Circle appeared to be learning faster than their
husbands. Why was that? I explained that Mary
Collins, my new assistant, was doing a great job of
showing the men what they were doing wrong.
Both
women nodded. That's what they thought too. One
of the women had a suggestion. "For the second hour of
class, why not let Mary work with our husbands instead?"
I was
skeptical, but decided to give it a try. And yes, Miracle
Mary worked her magic on the husbands as well. But now
everyone in the Circle complained that they
wanted Mary back. So, taking a page from Solomon, I said we
could either saw Mary in half or next week we would share her
again, Circle first hour, Husbands second hour. No one
liked this arrangement, so I told everyone to bring a saw and
cut her in half. Then we could have a Bloody Mary. I thought I was hysterical, but no
one laughed. Reluctantly everyone agreed to share her
instead.
|
 |
The
following week was more of the same. No one was happy.
Sick of all the complaining,
I put my foot down. We would finish the month sharing
Mary, but next month we would stick to the
Circle. From now on, everyone was expected to switch partners or
don't take the class. If the married couples chose not to
return, I would understand. And what was the result?
In the following month, half the married couples continued and danced in the Circle.
The
other half quit.
The disruptions caused by all
the bickering strengthened my resolve to stick to my
guns. Fortunately at the point the returning students had seen the benefits
of the Circle, so they were more comfortable with
the change. However I was not out of the woods. Now it was the Newcomers who objected.
I told anyone who refused to switch they were
welcome to leave and get their money back. It was
a huge gamble, but it paid off. Eight times out of ten the
disgruntled Newcomers decided to stay. It was
the old "try it, you'll like
it" technique. By the end of class they
were usually on board with the idea. I was helped by the fact
that the majority of the class not only switched
willingly, but enjoyed the process. Once peer pressure kicked in, I thought I was home free.
Wrong.
It seemed like every month
there was a new headache. Something always
seemed to come up that I had never
encountered before. One night Captain Hook
showed up. True story. This man had lost his left hand in an industrial
accident. Now he had a huge metal hook in its
place. He and his wife asked to be allowed to dance
together in a Swing class and not switch.
Curious, I
asked him to dance to see what it was like.
I danced the girl's part. When my right hand got stuck
in the hook, I
realized a woman's hand could get badly
twisted by accident. It was
out of the question to expect this gentleman to join
the Circle.
It was not safe!
But there wasn't
any reason to send him home. I had an
idea. The man had a perfectly good right hand.
Why not trade roles in Swing Dance? The
husband and wife were fairly close in height, so I
suggested he learn to 'follow' and let his
wife take the lead. The man was confused,
so I said, "You learn the girl's part and your
wife will lead you." Why not? They smiled and
thought it was worth a try.
Adapting as best they could to his handicap, his
wife did the boy's part using her left hand and he
did the girl's part using his good right hand. Worked like a charm!! I smiled to myself. I had
made the right decision to let them dance in the
corner by themselves. Plus my suggestion to switch roles had
paid off. However, my smile was short-lived.
I had made a mistake. No one knew about the
hook and I did not explain this
unusual circumstance to the class. In fact, as the
man danced in the corner with his wife, most people
didn't even realize he was handicapped. Watching
this couple dance to the side by themselves, ten
minutes into the class I had three couples who
refused to switch. They said if that couple didn't
have to switch, then why should they??
Damned if you do, Damned
if you don't.
At this point I had no choice but to explain the
'Hook' problem to the class. You have heard
the term 'throw them under the bus'. I embarrassed the
poor man, his wife and myself thoroughly in the
process. I said if any couple had a reason as
compelling as the 'Hook' to justify not switching, I
would listen to it. The renegade couples backed
down, but now they felt embarrassed for picking on
this helpless couple. They had no idea
the man was crippled. Feeling guilty, one
couple left immediately and the other two frowned for the rest of the class.
They switched, but they were unhappy about it. Their mood affected everyone else. Attendance
the following week was half of what it was on
opening night.
That is how I learned that even if I win the
argument, I lose the war. The smart thing is
to draw the line ahead of time. In retrospect what I
should have done was explain the exception to the
class ahead of time so everyone was on the same page. In my defense I did not anticipate the
reaction of the three couples in the first
place. There really is something to be said for
experience. Over time I did learn
a thing or two. But this was Year Five and I still
had a lot to learn.
I wished to be flexible, but where do I draw
the line? Another time I let two partially blind
men take a class. These men were worthless in
the Circle. They could not even see me as I
demonstrated. I was forced to assign my
assistant to dance with them nearly full-time
because they could not see well enough to follow the
instructor. Not only did they deprive the
class of my invaluable assistant, the two men ultimately
did not learn a thing. Private lessons might
have worked, but not group lessons. Another time a schizophrenic
man signed up for a class. I cannot begin to
tell you how creeped out the women were.
Fortunately he did not return the second week.
The social work side of me feels for each and every
person. However, experience has taught me that GROUP
CLASSES do not lend themselves to EXCEPTIONS.
It seemed like every time I made exceptions, I got burned.
But you know me, I wanted everyone to be happy.
So that led to one of the worst mistakes I ever
made.
|
SEPTEMBER
1982
THE
STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S BACK
|
One would think my
life got easier when Victoria set me free in July. Not so.
The studio had grown so much that now I was held captive by the
studio. I suppose it was my own fault. By
introducing so many changes, I had no choice but to put out
fires at an alarming rate.
Earlier I explained
my transformation into 'Leader of the Pack'. In
1982, I was forced to wear another hat as well. For the first
four years I had been buddy-buddy with my students.
However,
starting in 1982 my role changed to School Principal.
With so many people, I had to make rules or expect chaos.
And so I became the one who had to enforce the rules.
This was a major headache because 99% of the fires took place
at the same time that I was trying to start my 7 pm class.
I was very uncomfortable in this role. As I said earlier, I was a born Rule-Breaker
who was now compelled to become a Rule-Enforcer. Not
just that, I was not wired properly to say 'No' on a
steady basis. My first instinct as a teacher was to please
people whenever possible. Another problem was my growing
impatience from dealing with the same partner switch problem
again and again.
|
 |
Invariably the
people who wanted an Exception never seemed to take 'no'
for an answer. They always seemed to want to debate
the Rule at length. That requires time. Here I
am trying to get to my class. Can't they see I don't
have time to explain it to them!?! This was all so very ironic.
After all, I spent my entire high school career debating the
Rules. I had so much fun arguing, it was actually a
game to me. Now, however, this ongoing headache seemed like
Bad Karma coming back to haunt me.
At the start, a significant
number of my students strongly preferred to only dance with each other.
However, over the summer, the malcontents began to drift
away. Those who stayed no longer gave me any trouble.
However, the Newcomers were a different breed. Several people
strongly demanded
to be allowed to dance with each other and no one else.
This angered me because I had a
large and quite prominent sign right behind the Registration
Desk that said, "SSQQ expects all students to switch
partners on a regular basis." So why did they
challenge my rule? Because it is the nature of some
people to demand they get their way. As I said
earlier, at first I looked for ways to compromise.
However, after a summer full of making Exceptions that
backfired, I made up my mind.
Follow
the rule or leave. No exceptions.
Wouldn't you know
it, the moment I made up my mind, I made another exception.
This incident took place in September and, of course, it
backfired as well. Daniel and Christina were getting
married in November. They wanted to learn how to
Twostep in preparation for their First Dance at the wedding.
I should add that Dan and Chris were a darling couple.
Daniel said, "If
you say no, we will follow your rule. But perhaps you
can see why practicing together as much as possible
in class is important to us."
|
Now it was
Christina's turn. On cue, the moment Daniel finished,
Christina said, "I agree with
Dan. Rick, it would mean so much to us if you could just
let us practice together for our wedding."
I was reluctant to
disappoint them, but I had just made a decision never to make
exceptions on this issue again. However, I was dealing
with a charmer of the highest magnitude. Just when I was about to
say 'no', Christina quickly interjected.
"Oh, Rick, please let us do
this. We will go over into the corner and not cause a bit
of trouble. Please??"
Oh no, not the
word 'Please'! No fair. I am a real sucker for
the world 'Please'.
Not only that, Dan and Chris had thrown
themselves on my mercy. I could resist defiant people, but
not a precious young woman who was practically in tears and a
decent young man who was about as polite as humanly possible.
How am I supposed to say no to that? So I gave in, but I
regretted my decision immediately. Why? I had a
hunch this was going to backfire badly. And so it did.
Despite my
misgivings, I walked Dan and Chris to class. Before
entering the room, I told them to instruct anyone from the
Circle who tried to dance with them to skip them and return to
the Circle. Then I opened the door and pointed to the
spot where I wanted them.
|
 |
As usual,
whenever I had to fight the Exception battle, I had to start
class ten minutes late. Never a good thing to keep 38
people waiting. Fortunately the first week
went pretty well. I was teaching a large Beginning
Swing-Jitterbug class. That first
week, 38 people stayed in the Circle and switched partners
while the wedding couple stayed isolated over in the corner.
In the second week, another couple asked
for permission to switch, making sure to point to Chris and Dan.
What was I supposed to say? Now two couples were out
of the Circle. It got worse. After the Break
which separated Hour One from Hour Two, two more couples
joined them without bothering to ask. Now there were
four couples not switching. I could see people in both
groups whispering to each other about what was going on.
When we met for the Third Week lesson, four more couples
left the Circle. I was aghast to see the class
separate into two groups. 24 students were
unattached singles who rotated in the Circle. They
were one side of the
room. Meanwhile 8 couples were in
the other corner. As
class proceeded, the two groups stared at each other with
hostility for causing this
mess. They blamed me too. Caught off
guard, I did not have a clue how to
deal with such a divisive issue. Not only did I feel
helpless to correct the problem, the morale was pathetic.
The absolute nadir occurred when several ladies of the
non-switching couples insisted at Break that I give special
attention to their partners. It seems their husbands'
leads and footwork were not improving like the 'single
men' were. In their words, without adequate
supervision on my part, their husbands were simply not
getting it. I came very close to losing my temper.
What did they expect? If these couples had stayed in
the Circle, we wouldn't have this problem.
Now they expected me to give them the lion's share of my attention.
In addition I was mad at how rude these women were. They did not ask politely.
But my hands were tied. Seeing my class on the verge
of falling to pieces, I reluctantly sent Gabriela over to
concentrate on the couples while I chose to dance with the
single men and women for the rest of the night.
|
With
Gabriella gone, we had three more men than women.
Without thinking, I announced I would be dancing the
girl's part for the rest of class. Bad move. Now the Singles were
upset, especially the men. They were not happy about dancing with me. They much preferred the sexy assistant. Why
should those jerks who deserted the Circle get Gabriella?
As one
man after another griped, some of the men even refused to
dance with me. That is when I realized my
mistake. Up till now, I only danced the girl's
part in classes where the students were used to me.
However this was a Beginning class. These
people were all new to the studio and it was too
weird to suddenly see me switch to the girl's team
without an adequate explanation. At this point
everyone in the room was hostile. When I saw
everyone leave with a huge frown on their face, I
had a bad feeling about next week.
Sure
enough, the fourth and final class was much worse,
maybe even the worst class of all time.
Attendance dwindled from 40 in Week One to 12 in
Week Four. Boy, was I mad! Making this
exception had cost me 28 students. Speaking of
Dan and Chris, I could tell by their expression they
knew my favor to them had turned into the road to
ruin. Embarrassed by the trouble they had
caused, they left without a word after Break.
So did another couple.
|
The mood in the
final hour of Week Four was not fun. However, with so few
people left I was able to talk everyone into using the Circle
again. Then one couple changed their mind and insisted on
staying apart again. Just shoot me. Quite frankly,
no one finished that course in a very good frame of mind.
The final humiliation came one week later.
It was the start of the new month. Only 7
people from the original 40 showed up for the
Intermediate level. They were all single. Not
one couple had continued on. Normally at least half the students will go on
to the next level, so this small class was disappointing to
say the least.
I was furious.
My decision to accommodate people who did not
wish to switch had not only ruined my Beginner class, it had crippled my Intermediate class as well.
As they say, no good deed goes unpunished. This was a
hard lesson to learn, but I realized I had no choice but to put
my foot down. In fact, the outcome of this incident upset me so much
that it became the straw that broke the camel's back.
Feeling ice cold steel flowing into my veins, from now on rotating partners was the
law of the land. No more Mr. Nice Guy. I would rather refund tuition than
have people refuse to switch.
|
 |
Like I said,
Growing Pains. Most of the time running the studio
gave me tremendous satisfaction, but some of the time my blood would boil. Welcome to the Real World.
So
what happened the next time this problem arose? As
usual, I was summoned to the Registration Desk.
A couple new to the studio did not want to switch. Gee, what a
surprise. I told them they would have to switch, then
added they could get their money back if
they were not satisfied. Just be sure to ask before
the start of the Second Hour.
"Since
you are already here, you might as well give a try.
If you don't like it, leave at Break and get a
refund."
The
husband and wife looked at each other. Unsure,
the wife turned to me and said, "Maybe we could just
come in and watch."
I was in
a hurry to get to class, so I said, "I'm sorry,
but no watching!. You will need to
participate."
The wife
replied, "Why can't we watch? And why is
switching so important?"
Given my
exhaustion at dealing with this problem, I replied,
"SSQQ is like a nudist colony. You're either naked
in the hot tub like everyone else or you have to
leave. In or out, can't have it both ways."
Mind you, I had never
been naked in a hot tub and probably neither had
they, but to
my surprise they both laughed. That broke the
ice, so they decided to give it a try.
Encouraged, I began to use this phrase on a regular
basis. My flippant response did not always
work, but I will say it worked more often
than not. The important thing is that the
goofy phrase helped me bypass time-consuming
debates.
There are those who
say "The Customer is always right!"
Unfortunately, I do not agree. If the customer
refuses to respect the rules, why argue? I
learned this lesson the hard way.
|
At the risk of
repeating myself, nothing incensed me more than rumors of
dance professionals who called SSQQ "The McDonalds of
dance studios." Since they were gifted dancers who
taught gifted students, they assumed that made their
studio superior to ours. Why doesn't SSQQ hold
in-house competitions? Why don't their students enter dance contests
at the clubs? Why don't they train their students to
give exhibitions? Why don't they
use contracts? Why don't they sell more private
lessons? Why are so many of their students mediocre
dancers?
The
criticism that our dancers were sloppy and poorly-trained
irritated me no end. It was true that I drilled my new
students on the importance of practicing as soon as
possible. What do you expect from
Beginners? People have to start somewhere. As
always, people see what they want to see. The critics
would see our Beginners stumble and ignore the really good
dancers on the floor. In other words, if someone's
dancing was atrocious, they must be from SSQQ, but if they
were good, they must have learned someplace else. In
reality, SSQQ had a legion of students who
had been dancing non-stop for one year,
two years, and a few remaining ex-Disco dancers for three years.
Practice makes Perfect. These people were good!
They would give any private lesson devotee a run for their
money. Nevertheless, the day Scott
came along to expose serious flaws in my teaching
curriculum, I was filled with chagrin. There was no
way I could have guessed that being tortured by Scott was
actually the
happiest of happy accidents. Thanks to him, I adopted
changes that ensured anyone taking Group Lessons at SSQQ would
get a sound foundation in the fundamentals of social
dance.
No one believed Group Lessons could teach the intricate skills
necessary to become an elite dancer. I agreed, but I
also disagreed. As of 1982, the studio
was still a work in progress. However the day would come
when our Group Lessons were so perfectly organized that they
matched Private Lessons for effectiveness. The Circle
was the first step, switching partners was the second step,
Friendship was the third step, but what about the mysterious
fourth step? I never imagined just how important the
fourth step would become. Can you guess what it was?
I have dropped enough clues, so it should not be difficult.
Answer soon to come.
Nothing got
under my skin faster than having my studio disrespected for
conducting cheap, fast-food group lessons. Oh great,
my program is considered the Burger
King of dance studios. Take a quick lesson, hit the
dance club afterwards and step on some poor girl's feet. In defense of
SSQQ, I don't think our critics understood what I was trying
to do. The studio primarily taught people who wanted
to learn to dance for the fun of it. Let's say you
want to learn enough to dance at a wedding reception, a high
school reunion or a cruise trip. Or maybe you want to
learn enough to go to a club and ask someone to dance.
SSQQ was perfect for
that. To
my knowledge, no other dance studio in Houston had ever paid so much
attention to inexpensive, non-contract Group Lessons before.
If someone wished to Dance with the Stars, then Private
Lessons were the way to go. However the majority of people do not harbor aspirations
to perfection. Their goal was to become a reasonably good dancer at a
reasonably good price in a relatively short time. In that case, SSQQ Group Lessons would
work just fine. That modest goal worked for the first
four years of my dance career. But now I wanted to do
better.
|
 |
There is an ancient adage:
"In partner dancing, whenever something goes wrong, it is always
the man's fault." Unfortunately, that is
true most of the time. And since many men are overly
sensitive about having their mistakes pointed out, they
claim that women complain too much.
Now, however,
thanks to Scott the Barbarian, I realized the truth was just
the opposite.
It was like an iceberg. Yes, some
women complained, but most women put up with far more pain
and unnecessary roughness than men realized.
In
the men's defense, their mistakes were not deliberate. They were
mortified every time I pointed out they were hurting the women they
were trying to please.
The
solution was obvious. I needed to find a way to teach men
how to lead better. Since men did not like dancing
with me, I decided to add female assistants to the Circle
Formula in my Beginner classes. These amazing
women made such an impact, they became the missing ingredient.
As the men rotated through the Circle, eventually they would
meet the Assistant. These gracious, socially
gifted young ladies would offer suggestions and
encouragement. Indeed, their appearance was met with
universal applause. The women liked it because
overnight the men became more gentle. The men liked it
because their partners showered them with praise over the
improvement.
Judy Price liked my idea too. She asked, "Rick, can I
add a male assistant? That way he can tell me what the
women are doing wrong."
That made sense, so I said of course. I
had noticed that men seemed to catch on faster from Judy than they did from me.
I wondered if that was due to Judy's ability to dance with the men in
class and offer
instant feedback. That made all the sense in the world. On the spot
I decided to make another change. I added a lady volunteer to
assist me in EVERY CLASS
I taught, not just the Beginner classes. Then I told Bob Job to do the same. From here on
out, every assistant would report back to the instructor what the men were doing
wrong. In addition, she would correct the men if they were willing
to listen.
(Note to Reader: men don't always listen to women. No doubt
that does not come as a surprise.) The men who respected
the advice found they made faster progress.
Eventually even the hard heads started to listen.
|
The caliber of my instruction took a Quantum Leap forward
thanks to addition of women assistants. Over time our
assistants proved so effective this led to a profound change
I referred to as the 'Apprentice System'.
Victoria was gone now, so we needed a replacement. As
the studio grew, Bob and Judy could not handle teaching
seven nights a week. Nor could I. Whenever an
opening for a teacher occurred, I would promote the most
talented assistant to teacher rank. In other words,
volunteering to help with a class amounted to on-the-job
training. By listening to how Bob, Judy and I
explained things, the Assistants were learning how to teach
a dance class in addition to mastering the art of tutoring students.
My lady
assistants also gave me a face-saving way to insist on
switching partners. Most people do not mind sharing
partners, but if even one
couple refuses to switch, then the selfish side of human
nature is tempted to appear. "Why should I switch
if they don't?" From now on I wasn't
going to give anyone a choice. The Dan and Chris
incident convinced me for our Group Classes to work,
switching had to be mandatory. So whenever there was
hesitation, I would point to Mary or Gabriella and
make a speech.
"In order for
Gabriella to dance with all the men, we need to rotate
constantly. That way I can dance with all the women
too."
This speech
never failed to work, especially since the men could not
wait to get their hands on this Latin beauty.
Fortunately, over time, my students realized these talented
lady assistants made a big difference. By correcting leads as
the men went along, the assistants made friends in the
process. By practicing with the assistant plus the 10-15
female students he met in the Circle, a man's leads improved at a
much faster rate than when he only danced with
one woman. By the time he finally made it back to his wife or
girlfriend in the Circle, invariably she would marvel at the
improvement. Meanwhile the ladies were
learning how decipher the signals from 15-20 different men.
In the process,
her following skills improved. The dramatic increase
in progress convinced my students that
switching partners was a good idea after all.
I was very
careful in my choice of assistants. I could
not expect a woman to volunteer her time five nights a week,
so I asked five women to volunteer one night a week.
In no time at all, I had a stable of volunteers. There were so
many good lady dancers at the studio, I had a wide range of
choices. So
who were these assistants? One would assume they
were the best dancers, but not necessarily. More
important was their ability to relate to people. I chose
women with exquisite social skills, women who were kind.
Let's face it, some men do not handle criticism well. That
includes me. I observed that certain
women had the ability to point out a man's mistakes without
hurting his feelings. These were the women I asked to
become my assistants.
Men need dance
lessons more than women. It takes a lot of practice to
coordinate leads and footwork. As the studio expanded,
two-thirds of my teaching staff was female. That was
because women are
better at delivering suggestions to men without hurting
feelings. Whenever an opening came up, I would ask the best
of my lady assistants to become the new teacher.
That is why women who wanted to become teachers would
volunteer to become my assistant. Oddly enough, even
though everything was done on a voluntary basis, these were
coveted positions. Was there a casting couch?
Absolutely not. These spots were granted strictly on
merit.
This was a part-time job, one night a week. One might
ask why these positions were coveted. Teaching dance is fun. Lots of laughter, the challenge of explaining how
a difficult move works, the chance to interact with alert, friendly
people. I was always gratified at the high caliber of
people who were happy to pitch in without pay.
These were highly-educated people who were paid huge
salaries at their day jobs. I was amazed that the best of
the very best were willing to give up one night a week of
their busy lives to whisper 'Slow Slow Quick Quick'
to grateful Beginners. What
did I ever do to deserve these warm, caring people who
donated their time to help?
I
came up with two reasons why so many talented men and women
volunteered. One was Enlightened Self-Interest, the
other was a desire to contribute. There was something
about the studio I had long suspected, but in
1982 it became clear. This was the year I got in touch with the
intangible Spirit that ran through the studio. The
first four years of teaching had been so hectic, I did not have much time to reflect.
Fortunately, now that the studio was established, I
had time to see the Big Picture. Forgive me for being
mushy, but I believed SSQQ had God's blessing.
After my bitter experience with Jann,
I
worried that people would laugh at me if I gave
public voice to my belief. However in the privacy of
my thoughts I was convinced SSQQ was more than 'just a dance studio'.
Of course
SSQQ was a great place to learn to dance, but it also had a
special healing quality. I noticed
some students treated the studio as a sanctuary
where they could be around friendly people while they
recovered
from a divorce or failed relationship. The students
were so clean cut that SSQQ was just as decent as a church
and probably way more fun. Naughty
but nice. So was I the only person who sensed this
Spirit? Of course not! Lots of people 'got it'.
Well aware that SSQQ was a nurturing place, they were moved to
contribute any way they could. Like me, no one was
willing to say it out loud, but we sensed the Christian Spirit of Giving was
very much in effect.
So
what about that Enlightened Self-Interest? Did you know I once lost
eight lady assistants in a row? Wednesday
was always our busiest night of the week. Since
our Wednesday classes were large, I chose the best of the
best to help me.
Although these ladies worked for free, they didn't seem to care. They
made plenty of money at their day jobs. So why did they quit so often? Did
I criticize or embarrass them? Far from it. I
worshipped these women. See if you can guess why they
quit. The answer is bound to tickle
you, so I will offer a hint. How would I describe these women? Pretty?
Always. Intelligent? Always. Charming?
Definitely! Warm? Yes. Socially-gifted?
So much more than me. Funny? Yes. Plus
they all had one other attribute. Guess guess guess.
What could it be??
Keep guessing.
Keep guessing.
Keep guessing.
What was special about these women?
Not only were they beautiful, warm, and intelligent...
They were single.
And men they met in class were
constantly asking them out.
So
why did they all quit? You can guess this. It's
an easy one.
|
The
reason these women quit was always the same. A man
she had met in dance class asked her to marry him. Look at it this way. What is the best
way to attract attention? Find a Stage where people
can see you do what you do best. These were
exceptional women who performed a high-profile service in
front of a lot of single men. Put a woman in a man's
arms and her aura takes over. He sees her laugh, sees
her smile. He realizes how sweet she is and likes how
she teases him in a
gentle way. How can this guy resist the temptation to ask this lady out?
If she was interested, of course she would say yes. One thing leads to another.
When
the time came for my latest assistant to resign, sometimes she would cry out of gratitude. As if I had
something to do with it, right?? I understood where their unusual
gratitude was coming from. These ladies deeply appreciated
the supportive role I played in helping her meet her fiancé. First I was an
Archer, now I was their Cupid.
As for me,
I told each lady how grateful I was for her generous
offer to help. I hated losing them, but seeing their joy
made it much easier to accept. These women were in love. That was
all I needed to know.
Do
you want to know something funny? Somewhere around
the third or fourth Assistant in a row to get engaged, the other women at the studio figured out
what was going on. The next thing I knew, the moment
the latest engagement rumor popped up, I would have seven
women vying to take her place. The women at my studio were
no dummies. Like I said, the Circle turned
out to be the happiest of happy accidents. Switching
partners is what
turned SSQQ into the finest Wedding Factory ever invented.
|

|

What
do these ladies have in common? They all used their role as my assistant
(or teacher after being promoted) to meet their
husband. Keep in mind this is not a complete
list, but rather just the ladies for whom I had
pictures.
|
|



THE TEXAS TWOSTEP
CHAPTER ONE HUNDRED
FIFTEEN:
MATCHMAKER
|
|
|